Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
>>>> While at it, I would like to place a vote for having as few
>>>> command names as is feasible. In the current situation I find
>>>> I often forget whether I need ctxtools or xmltools or textools
>>>> or ...
>>
>> not all scripts are for everyday use ... when using mkiv some can go
>> away (rlxtools may be intergrated in mkiv for instance) but combining
>> all in one also complicstes matters (conflicting flags for instance)
>
> How about:
>
> $ mtxrun --script whatprovides tpm\*
> textools --tpmmake
> $ mtxrun --script whatprovides --all make
> luatools --make
> mtxrun --make
> mtxrun --script context --make
> mtxrun --script update --make
> texexec --make
> $
nice eh? i was thinking of merging luatools and mtxrun but they have too
different purposes
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@???
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
