Hans Hagen wrote:
> Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
>>> While at it, I would like to place a vote for having as few
>>> command names as is feasible. In the current situation I find
>>> I often forget whether I need ctxtools or xmltools or textools
>>> or ...
>
> not all scripts are for everyday use ... when using mkiv some can go
> away (rlxtools may be intergrated in mkiv for instance) but combining
> all in one also complicstes matters (conflicting flags for instance)
How about:
$ mtxrun --script whatprovides tpm\*
textools --tpmmake
$ mtxrun --script whatprovides --all make
luatools --make
mtxrun --make
mtxrun --script context --make
mtxrun --script update --make
texexec --make
$
;-)
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@???
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
