Re: [Foxet] fonts again

Top Page
Author: Bruce D'Arcus
Date:  
To: foxet list
Subject: Re: [Foxet] fonts again
Adam Lindsay wrote:

> Okay, you name 'Gill Sans' as the font family here, but to a computer,
> 'Gill Sans' is not the same as 'GillSans' down below, right?


Part of the problem is that I've never really understood the logic of
HOW ConTeXt thinks about fonts. It's incredibly frustrating; right up
there with trying to understand xml namespaces in a deep way!

Re: your suggestion, yes it was a little ambiguous, but I managed to get
Gills Sans to work. I still really don't have a clue how to tackle what
I'm really after though: the Adobe fonts. I forget Adam, do you have
xetex-friendly typescripts setup for these fonts?

Bruce
_______________________________________________
Foxet mailing list
Foxet@???
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/foxet